Hicks: Clinton Officials Denied Requests For More Benghazi Security

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Deputy Chief of Mission for the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, Libya Gregory Hicks pushes back on the latest shameful attempt to shield Hillary Clinton’s State Department from blame for the security situation in Benghazi the night of the deadly attacks, namely that slain Ambassador Stevens unilaterally refused offers for more security from the military. As Hicks writes, it was actually a senior official in Washington, DC who refused Ambassador Stevens’ request for more security, and the Ambassador following protocol in declining the offers:

Some have been suggesting that the blame for this tragedy lies at least partly with Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was killed in the attack. This is untrue: The blame lies entirely with Washington. …

Chris had requested on July 9 by cable that Washington provide a minimum of 13 American security professionals for Libya over and above the diplomatic security complement of eight assigned to Tripoli and Benghazi. On July 11, the Defense Department, apparently in response to Chris’s request, offered to extend the special forces mission to protect the U.S. Embassy.

However, on July 13, State Department Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy refused the Defense Department offer and thus Chris’s July 9 request. His rationale was that Libyan guards would be hired to take over this responsibility. …

Because Mr. Kennedy had refused to extend the special forces security mission, State Department protocol required Chris to decline Gen. Ham’s two offers to do so, which were made after Aug. 6. …

When I arrived in Tripoli on July 31, we had over 30 security personnel, from the State Department and the U.S. military, assigned to protect the diplomatic mission to Libya. All were under the ambassador’s authority. On Sept. 11, we had only nine diplomatic security agents under Chris’s authority to protect our diplomatic personnel in Tripoli and Benghazi. …

To sum up: Chris Stevens was not responsible for the reduction in security personnel. His requests for additional security were denied or ignored. Officials at the State and Defense Departments in Washington made the decisions that resulted in reduced security. …